Key Points:
✔ Rahul Gandhi denies authorizing a plea citing threats to his life in the Savarkar defamation case.
✔ Congress claims the lawyer acted independently, without party or Gandhi’s approval.
✔ Legal and political tensions rise as the case takes an unexpected turn.
New Delhi, [Date]: The ongoing defamation case involving Rahul Gandhi and his remarks on Veer Savarkar has taken an unexpected twist after the Congress leader disowned a controversial plea filed by his lawyer, which alleged threats to his life. The party has now clarified that the legal move was made without Gandhi’s consent, raising questions over who authorized the submission.
The plea, submitted in a Maharashtra court, sought additional security for Gandhi, citing potential risks to his safety. However, Congress officials swiftly distanced themselves from the claim, stating that the lawyer acted independently. “The party and Rahul Gandhi were not consulted before filing such a plea. Appropriate action will be taken,” a senior Congress leader said.
This development has added fuel to the political fire, with BJP leaders questioning the credibility of the legal defense. The defamation case stems from Gandhi’s 2023 remarks on Savarkar, which triggered backlash from right-wing groups. Legal experts suggest that the unauthorized plea could complicate proceedings, as courts typically require direct client approval for such submissions.
As the controversy unfolds, all eyes are on the next hearing, where the court may seek clarity on the disputed plea. Meanwhile, political analysts see this as another chapter in the high-stakes legal battles surrounding Gandhi, whose statements often spark nationwide debates.
Stay tuned to AlwaysFirst for the latest updates on this developing story.
Leave a Reply